Cherry, part 2

Hi all

Here’s some thoughtful power play by team Vishnevsky. They landed in a precariously high contract of 5 [3NT is unbeatable] and needed a soft(ish) spot in the defence to land on the head of a pin.

West
North
East
South
 
 
pass
1
2
Double
pass
4
pass
5
a.p.
 
North
AJT5
85
KJ83
Q83
South
K4
AK72
Q
AT7652

West led the Ace and continued for dummy’s King. The Queen of gets covered with the King and West shows out!

Now you have to disarm that J94 and take care of your remaining loser as well.

South analyzed correctly that crossing to the Ace to play a top wouldn’t work, I (East) would just discard a . Then on the trump switch I would rise with the Jack to transform my 9 into superman, because North is left entryless.

So South needed another entry to dummy, and found it by finessing against West’s Queen. Now he was able tackle the delicate trump position, for he had a second entry to dummy when he could overtake his King with dummy’s Ace.

East Dealer
NS Vul
North
AJT5
85
KJ83
Q83
West
Q92
QJ74
AT9754
East
8763
T63
62
KJ94
South
K4
AK92
Q
AT7652

So where’s the defensive soft spot? Geoff could have foiled declarer’s cunning plans by inserting the Queen, instead of following small. Denied the second entry to dummy South is unable to untangle the trump position.

Cherry, part 1

Hi all

Last Saturday we had our GNT semi-finals match against team Vishnevsky. They beat us by 27 imp. I don’t feel too bad about it, it was a good match. No excruciating blunders, as far as I can remember. The small sting I still feel is that the slams were not very friendly to us, but more on that later.

This deal was funny.

West
North
East
South
 
1
pass
1
2
2
pass
4
a.p.
 
 
 
North
AQ96
QJT42
QT7
K
South
T8732
K5
QJT952

West started with Ace and another and the King won the trick.

South knew his safety plays, played a to dummy’s Ace and ruffed a intending to play a towards the Queen. But … the got overruffed with the Jack. Declarer was left with a trump loser and the Ace of so ended up one trick short.

North Dealer
NS Vul
North
AQ96
QJT42
QT7
K
West
KJ5
AJ9842
A764
East
4
AK987653
63
83
South
T8732
K5
QJT952

South ran into the 0.16% odds that the suit broke 0-8. A lesser player would have taken the finesse and end up with ten tricks. But here the safety play detonated unexpectedly in declarer’s own face.

Peregrine

Hi all

I’ll start with a small link dump:
Stanley & Natasja in India here.
René & Nira launching Bridge Big in Louisville here.

I’ve mostly gotten used to people abusing cards. But my grief over all the mutilations, the carnage, the hecatomb and the abhorrences people (including myself) sometimes commit has not diminished, it just got slightly less … visible.

Here are two sad, sad cases:

West
North
East
South
 
1
pass
1
pass
2
pass
4
a.p.
 
 
 

After my partner made his lead dummy proudly put down these cards:

North
AT64
7
AQT85
AKQ

* Segfault error *
* Does not compute *

Can I have a review please?

I ask my opponents if they are playing CanapĂ© or a strong and myself whether I could have blacked out during the the alerts. Nothing. All natural. Well, it sure is an approach, bidding your second shortest suit first then reversing into your longest suit and never get to mention your . I’ll let my readers figure it out whether it is a sound or winning approach. [The result was down one when my partner proved to have three trump tricks, and I added the King as setting trick.]

This deal is from the 2nd round in the GNT’s. Must have been that large cow that flew by.

West
North
East
South
 
pass
1
pass
1
pass
2
pass
2
pass
4
pass
4
pass
6
a.p.

After the auction I ask a couple things, 2 was non-forcing, 2 (false) preference, 4 asked for keycards and West showed one. Well, that’s certainly quite a hand, making a non-forcing bid first and then blasting to slam anyway.

South
A962
Q5
3
986542

Lead a trump?
No, that might endanger partner’s trump holding.

Any ?
No, for underleading an Ace I’m usually not brave enough in serious matches. And leading the Ace might set up too many pitches for declarer.

The Queen?
Speculative, it’s the unbid suit. It might establish the setting trick. But eventually I decide against it.

I lead my 5th instead.

East Dealer
NS Vul
North
JT
T9863
J72
QT7
West
Q754
K74
984
AJ3
East
K83
AJ2
AKQT65
K
South
A962
Q5
3
986542

As you can see, East didn’t really have the combination of cards she promised during the bidding sequence. The contract is reasonably sound after all, but in the end it came down to finding that lovely Queen. [She finessed.]

And this is where I wiped away that swamp of sweat on my forehead. Still a bit trembling for actively considering leading the Queen. Man! It would have resulted in one of the fastest claims ever.

If there’s anybody out there, what were my RHO’s thinking during the bidding?

Enhanced

Hi all

Last weekend we started beer batch #5, codename Noah. It is not unthinkable John’s 4 month old son enhanced it with some of his drool, the little guy was quite interested in the procedures and attention.

Here’s a deal from a very quiet night at Quick Tricks, I guess most regulars are in Louisville (KY) now for the Nationals. I played with a Dutch visitor (H.U.) who was here for a conference.

South
J97632
KQ2
AT4
3
West
North
East
South
 
 
pass
pass
1
2NT1
3
4
pass
pass
5
double2
pass
5
6
double
a.p.
 
 
 

1. &
2. Values

Partner starts with the Ace of and dummy puts down a boatload of and a suspicious looking Queen.

 
East
Q5
T73
8
QJT9654
South
J97632
KQ2
AT4
3

I play the 2 and declarer follows suit too. I’m glad it’s at least down one now … as long as partner switches !

Wait! Why is partner tanking now? … another hits the table.

Of course declarer ruffed, extracted the single outstanding trump, pitched dummy’s loser on his long , and wrote with a big smile +1540. I’m happy it’s just pairs.

East Dealer
EW Vul
North
T
AJ8654
KQ9653
West
AK84
9
J72
AK872
East
Q5
T73
8
QJT9654
South
J97632
KQ2
AT4
3

It’s cold 6 for us, and because of that tiny slip in the defence the adversary slam came home on top of that. Post mortem I would have bid 6 with H.U.’s hand over the value-double of 5. If partner has three to the King and a pointy Ace slam is already pretty good, and that’s not a even a double. What can I say? Blame the jet lag.

Flush

Hi all

I have been describing too many disasters lately, time for a small success: another deal from the GNT qualifiers. I pulled a fat rabbit out of a hat on my RHO. I could hardly suppress my chuckle over it.

North
Q84
93
A876
Q942
South
A62
T5
JT52
AKJ5

Sitting South I opened a 11-14 NT and got to play there. My LHO puts down an unbid extended Royal Straight Flush in . So after six tricks I’ve discarded to this position:

North
Q8
A
Q942
South
A
JT
AKJ5

By now East has discarded a card in every other suit. I don’t know why West didn’t bid those , but I’m going to play East for the remaining face cards. West exits with a small for dummy’s Ace and East drops the Queen.

I cross to my Ace and play Ace [ 2 in dummy]. King [ 9 in dummy], and I overtake my Jack with the Queen. Two cards remaining. I ask for the 4 and East hasn’t paid attention to who played the 3!

After a sweaty and embarrassing pause he lets go of the King (keeping the King), I overtake the 4 with the 5 and score my 7th trick with my top .

East Dealer
– Vul
North
Q84
92
A876
Q942
West
J953
AKQJT3
94
3
East
KT7
764
KQ3
T876
South
A62
85
JT52
AKJ5

It’s all in the small!

Fathom

Hi all

Last weekend we played a GNT A qualifier weekend. We’re still in, just two hurdles left for a ticket to Toronto this summer. Exit team Friedman and exit team Saunders. They were seeded pretty high, but I never even heard of them. I’ll just play my European ignorance card once again.

So one thing that I’ve learned this weekend is not to antagonize the asshole(s). Let them be. Let them suffer. Don’t take notice. And beat the crap out of them with cards, just cards and nothing but cards.

Here’s me taking a wrong turn. Say, roughly minus 15 imp.

South
KJT4
85
JT3
T952
West
North
East
South
1
1
1
pass
2
2
3
3
4
Double1
pass
… pass2
pass
 
 
 

1. Action double
2. I think I’d rather defend

West
Q8
KQT7
K84
KQ73
South
KJT4
85
JT3
T952

So I lead the Jack and dummy comes down. Geoff plays the 2 (according to Granovetter’s A switch in Time: don’t switch , please!) and declarer plays something small too. Now what?

At the table I unthinkingly continued and that was the end of the defence, for this was the complete deal:

West Dealer
NS Vul
North
A953
632
AQ9652
West
Q8
KQT7
K84
KQ73
East
762
AJ94
7
AJ864
South
KJT4
85
JT3
T952

Declarer ruffed the second , drew trump and cashed out on his . We write -590 and I see we’ve missed out on our best spot in a 4-4 fit 15-count 4. Or perhaps I should take that 2 at Lavinthal-face value and switch to a . At the table it just didn’t click in my head. Overall I’m glad the opponents made more mistakes over 128 boards, but I surely need to get my game up if I want to make it to Toronto.